DON’T ANSWER ME, DON’T BREAK THE SILENCE [546]

“Why would I ask a computer how to do anything?” My family could argue I do this all the time, especially if something piques my interest – I am not looking up information to prove what one of them said is correct, it is to find a citable source if I make use of it here later.

Asking for information, rather than just searching keywords, used to be the preserve of the search engine Ask Jeeves, later known as Ask.com, which accepted queries in natural language, the site picking the key words from the sentence. I did not know that Ask.com, since 2010 just an aggregator of results from other search engines, had only closed on 1st May 2026 – Jeeves had largely been dispatched with twenty years before.

If I want to look for something online, I prefer to be shown it. I certainly don’t need the computer to interpret it for me, for that will be my job. Research skills are far more than deciding whether certain words have been used lead to the correct answer, it is deciding whether a whole source is even relevant to begin with, something a computer cannot do without human input. 

I am veering back into feeing crotchety about A.I., despite previously pronouncing myself bored of talking about it. But the wagon will keep going until all resources have been devoured, from concerns about data centres affecting water supplies, to the manufacturing of Random Access Memory (RAM) chips being prioritised towards equipping these centres at the expense of consumer products, an issue that won’t see demand being balanced by supply until 2027-28.

What concerns me is that the increased cost of computers, smartphones, TV streaming boxes and so on will not come down when RAM chips become more readily available. More RAM will still be needed than before if the expectation of these devices is to run A.I. programs locally, instead of acting as a terminal to send and receive results from a data centre. The gallop towards A.I.-centric services will irrevocably change the expectations of the devices we buy – I say this as someone who has never turned on “Apple Intelligence” on my iPhone 17, leaving me with a fast phone with a decent amount of RAM.

I am slowly realising is that the interface most often presented by A.I. programs, namely just asking your device to do something, could become the expected way to interact with it. Forget your keyboard, mouse, or your fingers on the screen, for the microphone may soon be all you need.

I already ended a previous article by saying, “I don’t know what point I want to make, as this is my reacting to something that doesn’t sound right, but what helps others to work changes how I would work, so therefore, I’m not doing it.” However, I wrote this in 2020 about preferring to use a keyboard when writing on a tablet computer, because my “daily driver” at that point was an iPad. That is just how I work, as trying to type on a tablet screen will become uncomfortable – writing longhand with pen and ink is preferable.

But I could never dictate my work into a computer, or ask it to edit my work. I might say a sentence in my own head before typing it, but attempting to say it out loud before typing it is just anathema to me. This may not have been the case when, in previous decades, the device of choice would have been a human secretary: the level of mutual understanding in talking to someone is much easier than talking at something that, no matter what you are sold, will not think.

I know I shouldn’t be so worried. I am using my computer for “productivity” purposes, not something general. People would rather talk to something if it feels enough like talking to someone, and if this is presented as a preference over choosing apps from a screen, or filling in details yourself, then ease of use will win every time. There is every possibility that Microsoft Copilot, introduced as an element of Windows, could supplant Windows altogether. What I want a computer for, as someone who retains a subscription to use a word processor program – Microsoft Word, like most other people – is a “specialty” case, in comparison to general consumer computer use. I just resent having to pay more for wanting that.

IT’S TIME SOMEONE PROGRAMMED YOU [527]

The Russian "Aidol" robot collapsing at its unveiling, November 2025

When I ask “what comes after A.I.?”, what I mean is I need to know the ultimate outcome of the upheaval caused by the application of artificial intelligence into everyday life, especially as someone that has, as far as they are concerned, done their best to avoid it so far.

Am I thinking about a “post-A.I.” world, one where the technology has essentially become an endemic, integral part of how life is lived, or a world where people got bored of waiting for the future it promised, too conscious of the monetary and environmental costs of maintaining mainframes and data centres? Or am I thinking of a future beyond both these options, one mapped out by the machines that outstripped ourselves? This was science fiction once.

Right now, the A.I. programs we use remain “mechanical”, weighing user prompts against available data to generate the next outcome. This step went wrong when I asked Microsoft Copilot to explain “prompt engineering” in the style of Jack Kerouac, but because there was no actual thinking involved, that was to be expected. Already able to write confidently, draw with some ability, and manipulate photographs on a computer exactly how I need, I really have no use for the way A.I. is being pushed right now - I write this after the week Apple added generative text, equation and image functions to its Pages, Numbers and Keynote productivity apps, so long as you take out an “Apple Creator Studio” subscription to avoid missing out.

In February 2023, I wrote that I had already concluded I would not have a use for any creative generative A.I. program: “[If] you want help, or you simply want to cheat time and process, then you have now created a marketplace, and the producers want paying. Not only is it more rewarding to write that essay yourself, but it is also cheaper.” Three years of using A.I. programs have since followed, a wealth of data collected from users and subscribers, who consented to their collection of that data by their using them. It is not enough data to replace the plagiarism of copyrighted material, but enough data for me to consider whether the addition of A.I. functions to every program imaginable means tech companies will soon have “enough” data for whatever their next step turns out to be.

“Artificial general intelligence” is what I understand to be the current goal, going beyond mechanical prompts to match the human ability to think, well, intelligently. Could this then develop into an artificial general superintelligence, extending beyond the capacity of human thought? If we achieve that, we need to think now about legislation against equipping it with arms and legs.

It appears I am thinking about what comes after A.I. because there needs to be a world that still needs us. The current implementation of artificial intelligence relies on being told what is good for us in the long run, as if anything that doesn’t involve it is a backwards step, but a lot of the possibilities don’t appear to involve us. My job is in administration, but for how long will that job last? What kind of world would we have if A.I. stops being foisted on us, and just becomes a tool, just as the computer itself became?

Yes, this was an article about finding the right question. Next time, I will try to answer it.

 

YOU CAN'T PUSH IT UNDERGROUND [494]

Lately, I have come to feel that I am always running out of time. I may start the day with a to-do list in my mind, and the best of intentions, but deadlines abound: what do you need to get done, or have ready, before you leave home, start work, or before you go to bed? What free time does a working day leave you, and how much drive you possess to use that time productively as well? Or should you wait until the weekend, and will you have the energy to do anything about it then?

This predicament nearly derailed my attempts to put something out this week. For the record, and in case I ever change it, I put out a social media message every Friday to say what I will be writing about for the coming weekend - this is a practice I picked up from old 1950s drive-in films, particularly Ed Wood films like “Glen or Glenda” and “Plan 9 from Outer Space”, where the poster would be created first to generate the interest, and hopefully funding, to make the film. This time, I realised that at no point during the preceding week, I had given any thought, or put aside any time to think, what I could possibly be writing about next.

When I first thought of squaring the circle, of addressing the problem by making it the subject, I initially dismissed the idea as a pathology that needed to be worked out in its own time, and not as a discussion to be reasoned with towards a conclusion. For me, it boils down to a feedback loop: an anxiety over not being productive enough with my own free time, and the linear nature of time itself, where every moment is a moment you won’t have again, which creates anxiety. In terms of addressing it, this will again be something to ringfence time to properly address it – ironically, that might also be the answer.

Two resources have been sent my way to address these from different angles: “Professors as Writers: A Self-Help Guide to Productive Writing” by Robert Boice, a book with comprehensive diagnostic tools to assess productivity problems, and to build and maintain – I got a laugh from randomly opening at a page where someone had told Boice, “My God, you’re asking us to change our whole lifestyles!”, only to be told that they were the ones in control. The other was an article by Oliver Burkeman titled “The unproductivity challenge”, attempting to address the “completionist urge” by setting aside time to do nothing at all: “You’ll be claiming your right to exist, and to enjoy existing, regardless of your productivity.”

I may not be able to shake off the feeling that everything I have written here is a placeholder where a better idea for an article would have been, but this is the problem when you have an obligation to yourself to produce something new each week.

WHATEVER IT IS I’M AGAINST IT [241]

Warning: I came across something that made me think of the eternal British phrase, “you what?!”

I am currently on my third iPad since 2012, and outside of working at home or writing, which I do with a desktop computer, the iPad is my main computer. Because its graphic processor is superior to my bigger machine, my iPad is also my video editor, cutting shots by fractions of a second using the swipe of a finger. 

For these reasons, and because my desktop computer has a keyboard with proper keys, I have never owned a laptop computer. I have not yet encountered the need to take a computer from one place to another, proving how much flexibility I expect of my phone – my iPad has never left the house because I know how much it costs. Whenever I have used another person’s laptop, I either find the trackpad too fiddly, requiring me to plug in an external mouse, or I have tried to press something on the screen, only to realise my error. It does sound odd, but that is just how I work.

What I can’t understand is the release of keyboards for the iPad that include a trackpad. The first iPad went on sale in 2010, and anyone that needed to continue with a separate keyboard and mouse, or are not in a position to use a touch screen, will have found their own solution by now – I’m guessing this is Apple’s way of mopping up anyone that wants both a tablet and a laptop, but not one of each, although the combined cost of an iPad plus a Magic Keyboard, whether it includes a trackpad or not, passes the cost of many laptop computers.

Doesn’t a tablet computer also come with a trackpad the size of the screen? I can see Apple’s Magic Keyboard supports the gestures you would usually make on the screen, like using two fingers to zoom in or out of a web page or other object, but having the trackpad there does not instantly tell you to use that instead of the screen. Placing your finger on the trackpad, or moving a mouse creates a small blue circle on the screen, like a target on the old game show “The Golden Shot,” but again, you could point straight at the target.

There has been a great amount of convergence in technology over the last few decades, as evidenced by few people having a camera separate from their phone, or a television that does not access the internet. But adding a cursor to the screen of an iPad suggests a couple of threads are being unpicked. The primacy of the finger, over a stylus in operating an iPad was already challenged by the introduction of an electric Apple Pencil in 2015, in the name of productivity apps like Adobe Photoshop. Perhaps you can use your fingers at home, but not at work, just like you expect an expensive restaurant to provide you with a knife and fork.

I don’t know what point I want to make, as this is my reacting to something that doesn’t sound right, but what helps others to work changes how I would work, so therefore, I’m not doing it.